John Krasinski in a non-Office role that doesn’t suck?

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Tuesday, March 17th, 2009


Say it aint so?

Jonny Stewart II

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Friday, March 13th, 2009

I’m on the record with my dislike of Jon Stewart. I think he’s a little nitwit cunt who’s occasionally funny but mostly disingenuous and pompous.

Lately he’s been having a feud with Jim Cramer, for Cramer’s inability to correctly recommend stocks. I don’t particularily like Jim Cramer but his ridiculous shtick is less annoying than Stewart’s.

The scariest part of this feud is how the media establishment is furthering Stewart’s reputation as a demigod of college Leftism.

In viewing the latest element of the feud (or perhaps Cramer’s capitulation) Andrew Sullivan declared that “Stewart…is actually becoming an accidental activist.” That poor naive conservative. There is absolutely nothing ‘accidental’ about Stewart’s actions. While I find him intollerable, he is no doubt intelligent. Stewart and his writers know exactly what they’re doing. Their actions are planned and by no means transparent.

Sullivan should do himself a favor and stop buying the hype.

Wilkinson comments here.

Progress

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Friday, March 6th, 2009

Rock Band has been made redundant.

Cable’s Folly

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Thursday, March 5th, 2009

Though some might think otherwise, premium cable’s scripted shows are not infallible. Take for example, Showtime’s United States of Tara and HBO’s Eastbound & Down. Both of these shows fall flat, especially compared to the usual shows on these networks.

Thankfully Big Love has transitioned in to one of television’s best shows but here’s to waiting for the return of Dexter (Fall 2009), True Blood (Mid-June) and In Treatment (April).

Rushdie on Slumdog

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Sunday, March 1st, 2009
This is a patently ridiculous conceit, the kind of fantasy writing that gives fantasy writing a bad name.It is a plot device faithfully preserved by the film-makers, and lies at the heart of the weirdly renamed Slumdog Millionaire. As a result the film, too, beggars belief. [Breitbart]

Of course his views would be better if his books were actually readable, but he’s right.

Inquiry

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Thursday, February 5th, 2009

Is wanting to fuck Freida Pinto really a good reason to pretend a movie is good?

Doppelgänger

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Sunday, January 25th, 2009

Is Lizzy Caplan the poor man’s Zooey Deschanel, or vise-versa?

Golden Globes

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Monday, January 19th, 2009

I didn’t watch a second of it, but much of the American media claim that Ricky Gervais’ schtick was the highlight of the evening. Across the pond, not so much:

So why did a couple of English papers say it went down badly? Because they’re jealous lying cunts whose lives haven’t turned out like they planned and want everyone to be as unhappy as they are. [Link]

The Third Battle of Ypres: The Movie

Robert S. Porter | Canada, Entertainment | Thursday, November 13th, 2008

Passchendaele is Canada’s attempt at a movie. It failed.

The movie centers on the story of Michael Dunne (Paul Gross), a member of the 10th Battalion of the Canadian Expeditionary Force. We are introduced to him as he murders a German soldier by sticking his bayonet through his skull and is then injured in Europe and transported back to a Canadian hospital. Here he is subsequently diagnosed with shell-shock and falls in love with his heavenly nurse, Sarah Mann, played by Caroline Dhavernas.

As luck would have it, Dunn also meets David Mann, Sarah’s brother. David is a weak, asthmatic boy, desperate to join the Army so that he can a) continue to fuck his girlfriend [yes there are nipples!] and b) avenge his father, who, inconveniently, joined the war on the wrong side! Dunne attempts to persuade the boy not to join the army while attempting to get in Sarah’s pants.

Through his attempt to sleep with Sarah, Dunne helps her detox from her random morphine addiction. Once cleared of the drug, there is a poignant scene were Sarah sits in the window seat of Dunne’s hotel room, basked in the sunlight. This makes her into angel that Dunne first sees waking up in the hospital.

To set up the final act, David uses his girlfriend’s father to allow him to join the Army. Upon hearing this Sarah flies into a rage, because she believes that Dunne allowed him to join up the army, even though he had not. In a ridiculous scene, Sarah bursts into David’s girlfriend’s house, accusing Dunne of signing her brother up. Instead of saying “I didn’t do that” he reenlists in the army so that he can protect David in battle.

So both David and Dunne are now in Belgium, near Ypres, awaiting battle. To make the plot even more ludicrous, while they wait Sarah shows up in France as a nurse. In a beautiful scene, Dunne and Sarah fuck in the open with bombs exploding in the background. Truly heartwarming.

In the concluding moments of the film, the most ludicrous scene in film history is shown. During the assault on the German lines, David becomes enraged and charges the enemy. He manages to reach the lines and falls into the trench and a kind German officer spares his life, but then a shell explodes tossing David’s body into the air. For some reason the body happens to end up on a cross like section of wood. (Through the movie there are constant references to the German’s having crucified a Canadian solider)

Noticing this, Dunne immediately runs towards David getting shot a couple of times. Seeing that he was unarmed, the kindly German officer instructs his men to ceasefire. Dunne then goes up to the cross and pulls it out of the ground. He then-wait for it-puts the cross on his back and carries the body back towards the Canadian lines. So yes, Gross wrote himself into the movie as Jesus.

Ultimately, David is saved and Dunne dies of his wounds in Sarah’s arms. This is where I was the only person in the theatre cheering.

In looking at the themes of this movie, it’s basically anti-war. There is no real glorification of the war. Yet the movie was still terrible. The symbolism was overwrought and transparent. At one point when there is an ominous scene, the camera quickly moves to show a flock of evil birds. In a happier moment (as described above) Sarah is made to be an angel.

From the first shots of the movie, the tone is just off. You can immediately tell that the production values are limited. It just feels amateurish the shots are clunky and unrefined. At one point there is a shot where David is using a telescope, but the focus of the shot leaves it blurry and filling the entire screen. The acting of Paul Gross is laughable, and the even worse by the actor who played David. Dhavernas is better, but by no means convincing.

At the beginning I thought the movie could be a plausible, low-budget Canadian war film. By the end it was clear it was a low-budget, pandering, plodding love story, written by an inexperienced writer, directed by a man with no sense of the physical space and acted by an actor who doesn’t understand drama. F-

Addendum:

I forgot to mention that Passchendaele uses much from the Saving Private Ryan playbook. From the shot of the soliders walking past water to the injured soldier yelling “momma” it’s all there. It’s just done really poorly.

True Blood: A Review

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Monday, September 8th, 2008

To start: For a gay man, Alan Ball sure has a fascination with cunnilingus.

Overall I found the first episode to be quite odd, but in a fascinating way. The pacing of the show is quite slow and the tone is obviously macabre but also silly, funny, disturbing, and, in a way, eerily sexy. Add all of this up you have a odd, confused mess of a show that is quite unlike Six Feet Under. Nevertheless, there is something that draws the viewer in. I think I’ll keep watching.

Quote of the day

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Wednesday, July 16th, 2008
Sam: Just because a girl is pretty doesn’t mean she’s cool.Neal: Ok Sam, first of all, of course it does. [Freaks and Geeks]

Is Citizen Kane the most overrated movie in film history?

Robert S. Porter | Entertainment | Monday, June 16th, 2008

Yes.

Powered by WordPress | Theme by Roy Tanck